
\begin{table}[H]
\caption{Models of support for closing congress. Models include only the individual-level variables, populist discourse, and the main interaction terms.}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c}
\hline
 & Model 1 & Model 2 & Model 3 \\
\hline
Populist Discourse                & $0.05$        & $0.01$        & $-0.11$       \\
                                  & $(0.11)$      & $(0.12)$      & $(0.13)$      \\
Populist Speech x Pres. Supporter &               & $0.09$        & $0.19^{**}$   \\
                                  &               & $(0.08)$      & $(0.10)$      \\
Populist Speech x Non-Voter       &               &               & $0.16^{*}$    \\
                                  &               &               & $(0.08)$      \\
Presidential Supporter            & $0.14^{*}$    & $0.10$        & $0.05$        \\
                                  & $(0.08)$      & $(0.08)$      & $(0.08)$      \\
Non\_Voter                        & $0.10^{**}$   & $0.10^{**}$   & $0.03$        \\
                                  & $(0.05)$      & $(0.05)$      & $(0.06)$      \\
Support for Democracy             & $-0.06^{***}$ & $-0.06^{***}$ & $-0.06^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      \\
Satisfaction with Democracy       & $0.02^{*}$    & $0.02^{*}$    & $0.02^{*}$    \\
                                  & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      \\
Education                         & $-0.03^{***}$ & $-0.03^{***}$ & $-0.03^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.00)$      & $(0.00)$      & $(0.00)$      \\
Wealth                            & $-0.14^{**}$  & $-0.14^{**}$  & $-0.14^{**}$  \\
                                  & $(0.06)$      & $(0.06)$      & $(0.06)$      \\
Rural                             & $-0.12^{***}$ & $-0.12^{***}$ & $-0.12^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
Female                            & $-0.17^{***}$ & $-0.17^{***}$ & $-0.17^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
Interpersonal Trust               & $-0.07^{***}$ & $-0.07^{***}$ & $-0.07^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      \\
Neighborhood Safe                 & $-0.04^{***}$ & $-0.04^{***}$ & $-0.04^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      \\
Economic Evaluation               & $0.07^{***}$  & $0.07^{***}$  & $0.07^{***}$  \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
\hline
AIC                               & $72670.64$    & $72671.60$    & $72669.99$    \\
Log Likelihood                    & $-36309.32$   & $-36308.80$   & $-36307.00$   \\
Num. obs.                         & $81409$       & $81409$       & $81409$       \\
Num. groups: country:year         & $84$          & $84$          & $84$          \\
Num. groups: country              & $18$          & $18$          & $18$          \\
Var: country:year (Intercept)     & $0.05$        & $0.05$        & $0.05$        \\
Var: country (Intercept)          & $0.17$        & $0.17$        & $0.15$        \\
Var: country winner1              & $0.10$        & $0.08$        & $0.07$        \\
Var: country non\_voter1          & $0.03$        & $0.03$        & $0.02$        \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{\scriptsize{$^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:si_cong_mods_slim}
\end{center}
\end{table}
